>From my point of view is +1 allows you to contribute immediately Regards
--Filippo 2013/6/25 Jamie G. <[email protected]> > +1 > > For clarification - all our generated artifacts will be signed, and a tag > of our release created such that anyone could reproduce our release. > > The actual commit transaction to SCM is the only part that does not have a > signature. > > As to the snapshots appearing in poms, Central Nexus will not allow us to > release if it detects them during a promote - I do not believe however this > is related to SCM, that's probably a configuration issue of the release > plugin. > > Our release procedures and release check signatures scripts will need to be > verified post change. > > -Jamie > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Łukasz Dywicki <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 from me > > > > Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven > is > > not afraid of git as well. > > > > I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than > > they need. ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Lukasz > > > > Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> w dniu > > 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm > > > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel > > release. > > > [1] > > > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when > > > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues. > > > > > > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1 > > > > > > regards, Achim > > > > > > > > > [1] - > > > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html > > > > > > > > > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > > > > > >> hey, there is no 0 option :-) > > >> > > >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and > > >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier... > > >> > > >> Kind regards, > > >> Andreas > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected] > > >>> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a > > >> formal > > >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git. > > >>> > > >>> Please vote to approve this switch: > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git) > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments) > > >>> > > >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >>> -- > > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>> [email protected] > > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer > > & > > > Project Lead > > > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin < > http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> > > > Commiter & Project Lead > > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > > > >
