I see.
If I compare with starting directly from the OSGi framework, I can see
the following values:
- abstraction of the OSGi framework (supporting both Felix and Equinox)
- Pax URL by default (to support various type of URL)
- Karaf features (to extend the distribution)
Am I right ?
If we use the "Linux distribution wording", I would propose:
- Karaf core (as you propose)
- Karaf net (a "lightweight" distribution bootstrapped with an Internet
connection)
- Karaf minimal (like the net one but with all embedded in the system
repository)
- Karaf (the "complete" distribution)
Does it make sense ? Not sure ;) I have to think about that a bit.
Regards
JB
On 01/16/2014 11:08 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
The value is that you can just add any boot features to it that you like.
It can be your own stuff but it can of course also be the shell,
management, enterprise features, ...
So basically you start small but can add all of karaf and enterprise
features you like with just some small change in the config.
Christian
On 16.01.2014 10:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Christian,
what's the value of such Karaf distribution compare to OSGi framework
(felix) with some bundle in it ?
It's basically just framework + Karaf feature, right ? We don't have
shell, management, etc.
Do I understand correctly ?
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
