That sounds good. My term of minimal was a bit misleading perhaps as I
did not mean to replace the "minimal" distro we have now.
Core might be a better word for it. Of course we would need to also put
some disclaimer on the description of core as it is not very accessible
or usable without a little customization.
I also think we need to work a bit on pax url to see if it can be made
smaller (mostly regarding the number of bundles). I have seen some
discussions on the ops4j lists that go in the same direction.
Christian
On 16.01.2014 11:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
I see.
If I compare with starting directly from the OSGi framework, I can see
the following values:
- abstraction of the OSGi framework (supporting both Felix and Equinox)
- Pax URL by default (to support various type of URL)
- Karaf features (to extend the distribution)
Am I right ?
If we use the "Linux distribution wording", I would propose:
- Karaf core (as you propose)
- Karaf net (a "lightweight" distribution bootstrapped with an
Internet connection)
- Karaf minimal (like the net one but with all embedded in the system
repository)
- Karaf (the "complete" distribution)
Does it make sense ? Not sure ;) I have to think about that a bit.
Regards
JB
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
