+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof
On 17.10.2016 11:33, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider > deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support. > > I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's > following configuration of remote repositories: > > org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \ >> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=spring.ebr.release, >> \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring.ebr.external, >> \ >> http://zodiac.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=gemini, \ >> >> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots@id=sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases, >> \ >> >> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring-ebr-repository@snapshots@noreleases >> > 4 repositories are SpringSource ones and FAQ on their site says: > > *What is the current status of the repository?* >> The repository is frozen but will remain accessible *until at least 1 >> September 2014*. See http://www.eclipse.org/ebr/ for information >> regarding the Eclipse Bundle Recipes project to which users of the >> SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository should transition. >> > These 4 (3 for non-snapshots) repositories are queried during all > Maven/Aether resolutions. > > Maybe it's time to remove gemini-blueprint? What do you think? > > best regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > -- Krzysztof Sobkowiak JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member (http://servicemix.apache.org/) Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC (http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/)
