+1

david jencks

> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to consider
> deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support.
> 
> I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's
> following configuration of remote repositories:
> 
> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>    http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>> 
>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=spring.ebr.release,
>> \
>> 
>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring.ebr.external,
>> \
>>    http://zodiac.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=gemini, \
>> 
>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> 
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots@id=sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> 
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>> \
>> 
>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring-ebr-repository@snapshots@noreleases
>> 
> 
> 4 repositories are SpringSource ones and FAQ on their site says:
> 
> *What is the current status of the repository?*
>> 
>> The repository is frozen but will remain accessible *until at least 1
>> September 2014*. See http://www.eclipse.org/ebr/ for information
>> regarding the Eclipse Bundle Recipes project to which users of the
>> SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository should transition.
>> 
> 
> These 4 (3 for non-snapshots) repositories are queried during all
> Maven/Aether resolutions.
> 
> Maybe it's time to remove gemini-blueprint? What do you think?
> 
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek

Reply via email to