I'm not a friend of re-inventing the wheel a thousand time. Only use it if it really really matches. If it doesn't match our use-case, we should use johnzon
regards, Achim 2017-05-25 18:50 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > My preference for now is on the tiny Felix JSON parser (lighter than > johnzon). > > Regards > JB > > > On 05/25/2017 06:26 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> hmm ... we do have a JSON Apache Library, before we A) start our own, we >> should B) prefer it over any other non-apache library. >> That would be apache johnzon ;) >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> 2017-05-25 16:22 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: >> >> I'm evaluating GSON and the Felix "parser". >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 05/25/2017 04:18 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>> >>> From what I understand, this only applies to the org.json dependency. >>>> Most >>>> people tend to use Jackson or Gson in my experience which are >>>> appropriately >>>> licensed. >>>> >>>> On 25 May 2017 at 08:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, but we are using json for our "webconsole plugins". So, I'm >>>> changing >>>> >>>>> in our plugins. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 05/25/2017 03:39 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi JB, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought the felix team did some effort in replacing all that json >>>>>> stuff >>>>>> with internal handling. >>>>>> We should just update to the latest then ... >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-05-25 15:38 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Chris Mattmann (new Legal VP) sent a reminder about json dependency >>>>>>> use: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> As the new Legal VP, I am reminding everyone that the >>>>>>> grandfather exception for the JSON License and Apache projects >>>>>>> ended last month. As sent by Jim (our prior Legal VP) the relevant >>>>>>> text is below and I want to highlight the following statement: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have been using it, and have done so in a *release*, AND there >>>>>>> has >>>>>>> been NO pushback from your community/eco-system, you have a temporary >>>>>>> exclusion from the Cat-X classification thru April 30, 2017. At that >>>>>>> point >>>>>>> in time, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ANY and ALL usage of these JSON licensed artifacts are DISALLOWED. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are using json (org.json/json) in the WebConsole. I created >>>>>>> KARAF-5148 >>>>>>> to track this and I'm evaluating different alternatives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
