Hello I didn't work much with JDK9 (though JDK15 builds are already available[1]...). But maybe (if it's the only problem) `osgi.contract` can be added to system bundle via `jre.properties`?
I mean - we're ~10 years after Xerces hell already and I hope JAXB and other "endorsed standards" can be handled at lowest possible level... I admire what spec bundles do, but it still (IMO) look like a workaround of some fundamental problem related to adjusting JDK itself to OSGi... regards Grzegorz Grzybek === [1]: https://jdk.java.net/15/ pon., 27 sty 2020 o 08:38 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> napisał(a): > It makes sense to me. > > Let me create Jira and work on an improvement about that. > > Thanks for the proposal ! > > Regards > JB > > On 27/01/2020 08:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Yep, also means karaf.main must not depend on these ones but technically > it > > sounds very feasible and saner in terms of architecture (launcher > > responsability vs container like one). > > > > Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à 08:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a > > écrit : > > > >> Hi Romain, > >> > >> So, basically, your proposal is to remove jdk9plus and "force" use of > >> spec bundles, right ? > >> > >> It makes sense to me, but it means that any spec has to be a bundle and > >> started in early stage of the boot process. > >> If it's possible, it makes sense. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On 27/01/2020 08:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Playing with the r7 branch i tried to build an osgi-cdi distro but > >> stumbled > >>> upon the fact jdk9plus folder breaks resolution chain quite easily when > >>> switching of jdk. > >>> > >>> Long story short, having annotation, activation (and potentially jaxb > >> but i > >>> didnt need this one ;)) does not enable to have them as bundle in the > >> same > >>> version - so to do dynamic updates too ;) - and they miss osgi.contract > >>> entry config. > >>> > >>> I wonder if there is any rational to have them at all, sounds like > karaf > >>> can boot without them and just move to bundles all the logic > potentially > >>> needing them so no need to patch the classpath for java >= 9 IMHO. > >>> > >>> Did I miss anything? > >>> Is it something to plan to clean up for karaf 4.3.0? > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
