Right, I meant to suggest defining a standard convention is useful to provide clarity.
> On May 7, 2020, at 11:09 AM, Steinar Bang <s...@dod.no> wrote: > >>>>>> Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com>: > >> Have you looked at using local-repo? > > I don't think it matters too much where things are loaded from at karaf > boot, as much as what's put into that repo. > > I.e. I would like to specify a feature I want to add to the start set, > and then resolve everything needed to that feature (but nothing else, to > keep the image size down), and add it to an internal repo in the docker > image. >
