Yeah, I still have lot of ideas I would like to implement. But, let’s start with 4.3.0, and then, move on 4.3.x and even 4.4.x ! We can upgrade "major" version number anyway.
Regards JB > Le 9 oct. 2020 à 13:01, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> a écrit : > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 8:55:44 AM CEST Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hi JB, >> >> Think one key point for this ambition is to be able to ensure releases >> don't depend on a single man (whatever his quality is ;)). >> Checking on apache index it seems around 3-4 PMC are active (I can be wrong >> since I don't follow the list accurately from very long so happy if it is >> more), what about having planned (each two months?) releases and rotating >> in the PMC for the releases? The big advantage is that it enables fallbacks >> when needed and avoids to put pressure on a single man which is also a >> positive sign community wide and for the project IMHO. It can also enable >> to highlight that some points can be too hard and needs some love (not sure >> if accurate but thinking out loud it can be to split the repo in smaller >> ones to make releases easier, to make the build parallelizable, to automate >> dist upload, to automate site update with a "main" or script, etc...). >> >> Hope it makes some sense. > > +1 > > I would like to see a focus on OSGi Spec. R7 is from April 2018 but still not > fully implemented (yes, I know it's an enterprise runtime not only OSGi). > Everything else should come after anyhow. > > Regards, > O. > > >> Just my 2cts indeed. >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> >> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>> >> >> >> Le mer. 7 oct. 2020 à 06:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a >> >> écrit : >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I would like to be back on more regular/stable release cycle for Karaf. >>> Again, I was a little bit too ambitious in release content and it means >>> that releases have been postponed several times. >>> That’s not good and we should have some more stable/regular: my bad. >>> >>> So, now, the release should be more driven by time more than content. >>> Starting from now, I will try to keep regular releases. >>> It’s very important in the new Karaf direction, given the opportunity to >>> include more regularly coming features. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Regards >>> JB
