+1 Cheers, Jamie
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:42 AM Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, answers inline. > > wt., 27 paź 2020 o 12:00 Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> napisał(a): > > > On 27/10/2020 11:27, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > >> On 26/10/2020 17:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > >>> Hi guys, > > >>> > > >> What is the story with servlet-api, though? pax-web-features references > > >> 4.0.1 while karaf defines it at 3.1.0 -- leading to duplicate packaging. > > >> Seems strange, as Jetty 10 (servlet-4) is not yet released... > > >> > > > Pax Web 7.3.x is using Undertow 2 and Tomcat 9 (both Servlet API 4) and > > > Jetty 9 (still Servlet API 3). > > > > > > Even Pax Web 8 will use the same combination (Jetty 9, Undertow 2, Tomcat > > > 9) and jetty will be associated with "servlet-api compatibility bundle" > > > that adds package exports for javax.servlet.* to provide 3.1.x version. > > > > > > For now I think Pax Web 7.3.x needs both versions of servlet API... > > > > Ah, makes sense, thanks! > > > > Another question: could we align pax.cdi dependency versions with > > pax.web? I am currently detecting: > > > > [WARNING] Duplicate versions for > > org.apache.xbean:xbean-bundleutils::jar, 4.12 and 4.17 > > [WARNING] Duplicate versions for org.ops4j.pax.jdbc:pax-jdbc::jar, 1.3.4 > > and 1.4.4 > > [WARNING] Duplicate versions for org.jboss.logging:jboss-logging::jar, > > 3.3.2.Final and 3.4.1.Final > > > > (in features/enterprise is also using 3.3.2.Final). > > > > This would require review of pax.cdi.... Some time ago I was changing the > dependencies there, but didn't touch it for long time... IMO CDI and OSGi > don't fit at all. To be honest, I don't have time reviewing current state > of pax.cdi, but you're right - it'd need alignment with latest Pax Web > 7.3.x... > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > > > > > Thanks, > > Robert > >
