Ricardo, I share similar concerns as Tibor for the proposed repository, so probably the best thing is to start a new focused PROPOSAL thread to discuss.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:50 PM Tibor Zimányi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > > I would recommend, that you can ask for the exception, till we get an > agreement about the repository itself. > > Best regards, > Tibor > > Dňa st 4. 10. 2023, 18:35 ricardo zanini fernandes <[email protected]> > napísal(a): > > > Tibor, > > > > This action, AFAIK, is highly related to our repos, so I think we should > > consider moving and maintaining it. Another option is to whitelist it for > > now, but open tickets to migrate/review the whole pipeline in the future. > > Can we get a consensus from the community on what we can do now? Sorry to > > sound too pushy, but I really want to move forward since we need to start > > merging PRs, and without a working CI we can't. :( > > > > Cheers! > > -- > > Ricardo Zanini Fernandes > > Vida longa e próspera. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:13 PM Tibor Zimányi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ricardo, > > > > > > I don't think it is necessary to move that, you can create an INFRA > > ticket, > > > similar to this one, to whitelist the action: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24928. In my personal > > opinion, > > > the code in the repository has not much to do with the KIE community > > domain > > > and it will be another task to maintain it. However that is my opinion, > > if > > > there is a broad agreement to migrate it, I am not against it. > > > > > > "Was this kind of work assessed before the migration?" - This was > > assessed > > > as best as we could do at the time as we didn't know exactly what, and > > more > > > importantly in which form (GitHub Actions and GitHub Actions in other > > > organizations can be different - as you actually experienced, same with > > > Jenkins - you can have a different plugins set installed), is available > > in > > > Apache. Migrating a community that has over 100 various repositories is > > > very hard to assess up front. The migration was planned for multiple > > months > > > ahead, with multiple information streams about it, and all help from > > people > > > in the community to get this migration done is very appreciated. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Tibor > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:45 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Jan/Tibor > > > > > > > > Can we migrate this action to Apache? > > > > https://github.com/kiegroup/github-action-build-chain/ > > > > > > > > We are using it in our runs, and I believe that based on Apache policy > > > [1], > > > > we won't be able to use it. It's a quite complex action and it would > > > > be tremendous work to migrate everything otherwise. > > > > > > > > Was this kind of work assessed before the migration? > > > > > > > > [1] Actions in this workflow must be: *within a repository owned by > > > > apache*, > > > > created by GitHub, verified in the GitHub Marketplace, or matching the > > > > following: [..] > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > -- > > > > Ricardo Zanini Fernandes > > > > Vida longa e próspera. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:31 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jan, > > > > > > > > > > I think I can make more use of my time taking a look at GHA PR > > checks. > > > > > I'll start working on it! Thanks for the detailed report! > > > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > -- > > > > > Ricardo Zanini Fernandes > > > > > Vida longa e próspera. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:25 PM Jan Šťastný <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hello Ricardo, > > > > >> not sure if you're checking the other thread where I report > > progress. > > > > I'll > > > > >> try to summarize where you could jump in at the moment and justify > > why > > > > >> everything is taking so long. > > > > >> > > > > >> 1. We don't release nightly SNAPSHOTS at the moment. There's several > > > > steps > > > > >> leading to it, including moving projects from jboss-parent to apache > > > > one, > > > > >> fixing trigger issue in CI (should be fine when merged) and I > > suspect > > > > >> we'll > > > > >> hit a few more as we go. Then we can onboard to Apache nexus and > > start > > > > >> having snapshots release, which would simplify the rest of things > > > quite > > > > a > > > > >> bit. > > > > >> 2. For that reason, all builds need to build full the chain - a > > > > >> kogito-examples PR need to start build from drools, so that > > artifacts > > > > are > > > > >> installed, etc. We're using build-chain tool for that. The tool has > > > > >> significant issue at the moment (identified just today), we're > > looking > > > > to > > > > >> fix it in kiegroup/github-action-build-chain/issues/461 . > > > > >> 3. GitHub Actions, not being completely separate from these efforts, > > > > need > > > > >> to follow the same path at the moment I am afraid - no snapshots, it > > > > needs > > > > >> to be a Full downstream build. > > > > >> > > > > >> I am currently taking care of getting initial PR checks in Jenkins > > to > > > > run > > > > >> reliably (although way too long, I understand) and prepare nightly > > > > >> pipeline > > > > >> builds including triggers. > > > > >> > > > > >> Tibor is working on moving the repositories from jboss-parent to > > > Apache > > > > >> one, being a prerequisite for Apache nexus onboarding. > > > > >> > > > > >> Your area of focus could be getting GHA, just consider all that was > > > > said - > > > > >> before we have snapshots, we can't limit the scope of the build .... > > > and > > > > >> so > > > > >> on. > > > > >> Another area would be the Apache nexus onboarding itself - if it can > > > be > > > > >> initiated already, etc, you can check > > > > >> https://infra.apache.org/publishing-maven-artifacts.html. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards > > > > >> Jan > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 19:57, ricardo zanini fernandes < > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Hey folks! > > > > >> > > > > > >> > As you may know, since the migration, the PR checks are not been > > > > >> running. > > > > >> > So we are kind of blocked from merging anything based on our > > policy. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I intend to take a few hours to work on it. I'll try to make this > > > work > > > > >> at > > > > >> > least for kogito-runtimes to unlock the community: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/KIE/job/kogito/job/main/job/pullrequest_jobs/job/kogito-runtimes-pr/view/change-requests/ > > > > >> > > > > > >> > After that, I'll take a look at GHA. I assume we will have to > > > migrate > > > > >> many > > > > >> > actions to our own org or to shell scripts or try to do something > > > > >> entirely > > > > >> > different. But that's a topic for the future. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > That's been said, Jan and Tibor, can you please share any useful > > > > >> > information about this environment so I can start working on it? > > > After > > > > >> > fixing it, I'll share the outcome with the community so others can > > > do > > > > >> the > > > > >> > same in other jobs. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Cheers! > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Ricardo Zanini Fernandes > > > > >> > Vida longa e próspera. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tibor Zimanyi > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
