I just checked https://groovy.apache.org/download.html#distro and it does look like Groovy has moved all of their GAV to org.apache.groovy. At some point we'll need to do the same thing.
On 2023/10/23 14:01:12 Jason Porter wrote: > I missed some of this discussion as I was out on Friday. We should look at > what Groovy has done. They’re probably the biggest project that is in a > similar space (Java, Maven, number of artifacts, etc.) to us and has moved > over. I suggest we follow what they have done. > > -- > Jason Porter > Software Engineer > He/Him/His > > IBM > > > From: ricardo zanini fernandes <ricardozan...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, October 20, 2023 at 13:53 > To: dev@kie.apache.org <dev@kie.apache.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to > KIE/SonataFlow > As discussed offline, I'm gonna create a spreadsheet with the renaming > proposition and share it in this thread. > > We table the discussion about `apache` prefixing in GAV/namespaces for now. > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:20 PM Alex Porcelli <porce...@apache.org> wrote: > > > You have a point in regarding the change of all GAVs. > > > > My suggestion is to table that discussion for now, work on the inventory > > and proposed changes. Once we have it done, we may start a new thread about > > GAVs. > > > > Wdyt? > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:07 PM ricardo zanini fernandes < > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Alex, I can create and share this spreadsheet, so we can start working on > > > it. > > > > > > IMHO, we shouldn't start adding apache prefixes in some components and > > not > > > in others. > > > If we ought to add it, I'd rather add everything at once. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:58 PM Alex Porcelli <a...@porcelli.me> wrote: > > > > > > > Ricardo, > > > > > > > > Besides the SonataFlow proposed changes, Mario already mentioned a > > > similar > > > > change in Drools, and we'll need similar adjustments for jBPM. We > > should > > > > collectively create a spreadsheet to be shared in this thread with an > > > > inventory of the extensions we have with the suggested change; we look > > to > > > > this in a more comprehensive approach other than local to SonataFlow. > > > > > > > > Regarding the use of the Apache prefix, even if we are not necessarily > > > > required to adopt it right away, it's inevitable that we'll have to > > start > > > > using it at some point. Given that we're already discussing a reset > > with > > > > 10.x, it would help to make the message even more apparent and sharper > > to > > > > incorporate the Apache prefix in the proposed changes that we'll have > > in > > > > the spreadsheet. > > > > > > > > To be more clear and precise, the Apache prefix is expected to be > > > > incorporated only into the components in the spreadsheet AND nothing > > > else, > > > > so no complete change of GAVs or namespaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:51 AM ricardo zanini fernandes < > > > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jason! Are we required to change namespaces/GAV to include > > `apache`? > > > > I'd > > > > > instead do this simple change now since we must move on with > > > SonataFlow, > > > > > and then rethink all modules to include "org.apache.kie" prefix. > > > > Honestly, > > > > > if we are not required, I'd keep the naming we have today. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:54 AM Jason Porter > > <jpor...@ibm.com.invalid > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We don’t have to rename current code, but new code will need to be > > > > > > org.apache (sonataflow is probably fine). I was thinking if we’re > > > going > > > > > to > > > > > > rename packages group id now, we might as well make it Apache and > > > only > > > > do > > > > > > it once. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Jason Porter > > > > > > Software Engineer > > > > > > He/Him/His > > > > > > > > > > > > IBM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: ricardo zanini fernandes <ricardozan...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 11:47 > > > > > > To: dev@kie.apache.org <dev@kie.apache.org> > > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming Kogito SW artifacts to > > > > > > KIE/SonataFlow > > > > > > We have org.drools, org.jbpm, hence org.sonataflow. Can't we keep > > > this > > > > > > ubiquity? org.kie.apache.sonataflow is too large, IMO. If we go for > > > > > > org.apache.sonataflow, then maybe renaming everything else to > > follow > > > > the > > > > > > same pattern? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 2:30 PM Jason Porter < > > > lightguar...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm +0 on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we're going to rename it to SonataFlow, should we not make it > > > > > > > org.apache.kie.sonataflow or something similar under the Apache > > > name? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2023/10/19 12:42:53 ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > > > > > > > > Friends, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since we moved from "Kogito Serverless Workflow" to > > "SonataFlow" > > > > > > project > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose a naming change to those artifacts > > targeting > > > > > 10.x. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some are *only* related to SW which is implementation > > specifics. > > > We > > > > > can > > > > > > > > change to SonataFlow, for example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Description Extension Target > > > > > > > > Runtime development tools for SonataFlow > > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-quarkus-serverless-workflow-devui > > > > > > > > org.sonataflow:sonataflow-quarkus-devui > > > > > > > > SonataFlow Add-On - Includes OpenApi Client, the Process > > engine, > > > > and > > > > > > > > Knative Eventing capabilities > > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-quarkus-serverless-workflow > > > > > > > > org.sonataflow:sonataflow-quarkus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another renaming is targeting Kogito Quarkus Add-Ons to KIE > > > Quarkus > > > > > > > Add-Ons > > > > > > > > for generic proposes (works for SonataFlow, jBPM, Drools, etc). > > > For > > > > > > > example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Description Extension Target > > > > > > > > KIE Data Index Infinispan Add-On > > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-infinispan > > > > > > > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-data-index-infinispan > > > > > > > > KIE Data Index In-memory Add-On > > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-data-index-inmemory > > > > > > > > org.kie:kie-addons-quarkus-data-index-inmemory > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are also jBPM specifics, which I propose: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Description Extension Target > > > > > > > > jBPM Add-On for e-mail support on Human Tasks. > > > > > > > > org.kie.kogito:kogito-addons-quarkus-mail > > > > > > > org.jbpm:jbpm-addons-quarkus-mail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To keep things simple for now, we can refrain from renaming > > > > > namespaces, > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > GAV is important since we are moving to 10.x., so we start > > fresh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we agree, I can keep a spreadsheet with all the renames and > > > > share > > > > > it > > > > > > > > with the community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org
