Hi @Tibor (and all), I did a quick test today and I got a warning during startup regarding some of our Config classes we are using in our extensions / addons. IRC since Quarkus 3.15 Quarkus started deprecating the @ConfigRoot annotations we are using in our configs in favor of Smallrye. So far everything works fine because they keep backwards compatibility (we are using a specific flag in our extensions to enable the legacy mechanism) however it would be nice if we migrate to the new mechanism.
Some of the affected configs are: - org.kie.flyway.quarkus.KieFlywayQuarkusRuntimeConfig - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexBuildConfig - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexRuntimeConfig - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexUIClientRuntimeConfig - org.kie.kogito.job.http.recipient.JobHttpRecipientRuntimeConfiguration - org.kie.kogito.job.sink.recipient.JobSinkRecipientRuntimeConfiguration - org.kie.kogito.quarkus.config.KogitoBuildTimeConfig - org.kie.kogito.quarkus.config.KogitoRuntimeConfig - org.kie.kogito.quarkus.workflow.deployment.config.KogitoWorkflowBuildTimeConfig I raised this ticket https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1983 to fix it. I'll try to find time to tackle it during next week. Cheers! On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 16:17, ricardo zanini fernandes < ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Tibor! > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:10 AM Tibor Zimányi <tzima...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > the PRs for drools, optaplanner, kogito-runtimes, kogito-apps and > > kogito-examples were merged. I will continue with kie-tools when there > is a > > new weekly build of the libraries. > > > > Best regards, > > Tibor > > > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:23 AM Tibor Zimányi <tibor.zima...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I resubmitted the PRs for the Quarkus upgrade. There is one problem > with > > > serverless workflow test yamls. Some of those contain a field > > > "lastTransitionTime", like here (1). There is a current fabric bug > around > > > this (see the link in the comment). How important are those datetime > > > fields, please? Because the tests pass without those. Can someone from > > > serverless take a look at those problems? I tried to override > > > kubernetes-client to 7.2.0, however that doesn't work as Quarkus uses > > > 7.1.0. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Tibor. > > > > > > (1) > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3935/files#diff-df1637d3c414626b6682e77385559f33418b41f02c0ea46a6c472699a270bf1dR57 > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM Luiz Motta <ljmo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On 2025/03/24 09:53:01 Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > Quarkus 3.20.x should be a new LTS stream of Quarkus. I see 3.20.0 > > >> > artifacts already public, however there is still no public > > announcement > > >> > yet. Based on this, I think the release is imminent. Therefore I > > >> propose to > > >> > start working on the upgrade so it is prepared as soon as possible > > after > > >> > the Quarkus release. > > >> > I know we are in the middle of the 10.1 release work, so I asked one > > of > > >> the > > >> > people in the IBM team contributing to KIE (Ann Joy) to take a look > at > > >> the > > >> > work currently, to not slow down any progress on the release. If we > > >> agree > > >> > it would be good to have this being worked on, I will try to manage > > >> this so > > >> > it doesn't block the release work in any way. > > >> > > > >> > Is there anyone opposing this, please? What do you think? > > >> > > > >> > Best regards, > > >> > Tibor > > >> > > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Tibor Zimanyi > > > > > >
