Hi Tibor, Additionally, I think I mentioned to you that now our CI is breaking due to Keycloak devservices issues in tests. Can you please take a look? I believe we should disable these services since they are enabled by default by Quarkus 3.20 IIRC.
Cheers! On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 1:22 PM Tibor Zimányi <tzima...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes, makes sense. Thank you Pere for noticing this. > > Best regards, > Tibor > > Dňa st 28. 5. 2025, 19:09 Pere Fernandez <pere.fernan...@gmail.com> > napísal(a): > > > Hi @Tibor (and all), > > > > I did a quick test today and I got a warning during startup regarding > some > > of our Config classes we are using in our extensions / addons. IRC > > since Quarkus 3.15 Quarkus started deprecating the @ConfigRoot > annotations > > we are using in our configs in favor of Smallrye. So far everything works > > fine because they keep backwards compatibility (we are using a specific > > flag in our extensions to enable the legacy mechanism) however it would > be > > nice if we migrate to the new mechanism. > > > > Some of the affected configs are: > > > > - org.kie.flyway.quarkus.KieFlywayQuarkusRuntimeConfig > > - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexBuildConfig > > - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexRuntimeConfig > > - org.kie.kogito.index.addon.config.DataIndexUIClientRuntimeConfig > > - org.kie.kogito.job.http.recipient.JobHttpRecipientRuntimeConfiguration > > - org.kie.kogito.job.sink.recipient.JobSinkRecipientRuntimeConfiguration > > - org.kie.kogito.quarkus.config.KogitoBuildTimeConfig > > - org.kie.kogito.quarkus.config.KogitoRuntimeConfig > > - > > > > > org.kie.kogito.quarkus.workflow.deployment.config.KogitoWorkflowBuildTimeConfig > > > > I raised this ticket > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1983 to fix it. > I'll > > try to find time to tackle it during next week. > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 16:17, ricardo zanini fernandes < > > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Tibor! > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 7:10 AM Tibor Zimányi <tzima...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > the PRs for drools, optaplanner, kogito-runtimes, kogito-apps and > > > > kogito-examples were merged. I will continue with kie-tools when > there > > > is a > > > > new weekly build of the libraries. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:23 AM Tibor Zimányi < > > tibor.zima...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I resubmitted the PRs for the Quarkus upgrade. There is one problem > > > with > > > > > serverless workflow test yamls. Some of those contain a field > > > > > "lastTransitionTime", like here (1). There is a current fabric bug > > > around > > > > > this (see the link in the comment). How important are those > datetime > > > > > fields, please? Because the tests pass without those. Can someone > > from > > > > > serverless take a look at those problems? I tried to override > > > > > kubernetes-client to 7.2.0, however that doesn't work as Quarkus > uses > > > > > 7.1.0. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Tibor. > > > > > > > > > > (1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3935/files#diff-df1637d3c414626b6682e77385559f33418b41f02c0ea46a6c472699a270bf1dR57 > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM Luiz Motta <ljmo...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > > >> > > > > >> On 2025/03/24 09:53:01 Tibor Zimányi wrote: > > > > >> > Hi, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Quarkus 3.20.x should be a new LTS stream of Quarkus. I see > 3.20.0 > > > > >> > artifacts already public, however there is still no public > > > > announcement > > > > >> > yet. Based on this, I think the release is imminent. Therefore I > > > > >> propose to > > > > >> > start working on the upgrade so it is prepared as soon as > possible > > > > after > > > > >> > the Quarkus release. > > > > >> > I know we are in the middle of the 10.1 release work, so I asked > > one > > > > of > > > > >> the > > > > >> > people in the IBM team contributing to KIE (Ann Joy) to take a > > look > > > at > > > > >> the > > > > >> > work currently, to not slow down any progress on the release. If > > we > > > > >> agree > > > > >> > it would be good to have this being worked on, I will try to > > manage > > > > >> this so > > > > >> > it doesn't block the release work in any way. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Is there anyone opposing this, please? What do you think? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Best regards, > > > > >> > Tibor > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kie.apache.org > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@kie.apache.org > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Tibor Zimanyi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
