I don’t see that as problem at all, excellent solution! We could put the older 
releases on the kiegroup repos/org.

Toni or Kobayashi-san are one of you able to get those uploaded to github?

--
Jason Porter
Software Engineer
He/Him/His

IBM


From: Toni Rikkola <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 11:14
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSSION] Web site maintenance
Not sure if I understand the problem correctly, but we could we push the
items as they are into a GitHub repository and serve the legacy pages
from there? Basically the same thing as hosting them at Red Hat, but
without a risk of a rug pull.

Or if the docs were packaged and published to a maven repository, link
to those.

Toni

On 22/10/2025 19.38, Jason Porter wrote:
> Yes, that would be acceptable. Maybe put everything under a “Non-Apache 
> Software Foundation Previous Releases and Documentation” or “Previous 
> Releases and Documentation Prior to ASF Migration” section. Both of those are 
> a lot of words. Maybe there’s a better way to say that.
>
>
>    *   https://groovy.apache.org/download.html   - Though I don’t like how 
> they have small wording saying it is not ASF
>    *   Netbeans doesn’t have anything
>    *   https://www.openoffice.org/download/archive.html   - OpenOffice calls 
> them “Archived Versions” – maybe we could do the same?
>    *   CouchDB doesn’t have any of their pre-ASF releases
>    *   Doesn’t look like Derby does either
>    *   Neither does subversion
>
> It doesn’t look like there is a consensus among different projects as to how 
> they handle this situation.
>
> Given what Alex stated about the JBoss Infra, I don’t know if we have a good 
> answer to this ☹
>
> --
> Jason Porter
> Software Engineer
> He/Him/His
>
> IBM
>
>
> From: Toshiya Kobayashi <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 19:48
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSSION] Web site maintenance
> Hi all,
>
> I checked that on the incubator ML.
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/gbwc1yypc03wb0hw1mf5fxwhh8ypzyrj 
>
>> Only releases made under the Apache Incubator can be hosted on ASF 
>> infrastructure like kie.apache.org.
>>
>> Older (pre-Apache) releases such as 7.x or 8.x cannot be mirrored or served 
>> there, but you may link to them from your download page if it’s made very 
>> clear they’re non-ASF releases (e.g., add a note like “These are pre-Apache 
>> releases and not ASF-approved.”).
> So, we cannot move old docs/binaries to kie.apache.org.
>
> Currently the kie.apache.org website has pages with links to the older 
> versions.
>
> https://kie.apache.org/docs/components/drools/drools_old_documentation 
> https://kie.apache.org/docs/components/drools/drools_old_downloads 
>
> I think that's the right direction. The wording should be improved by
> clarifying they are non-ASF releases.
>
> Would that be acceptable?
>
> Regards,
> Toshiya
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 3:24 PM Toshiya Kobayashi
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi, our mentors
>>
>> Is it okay to move the old downloads (released before our ASF move) to
>> kie.apache.org so that users can download them?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Toshiya
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:15 AM Jason Porter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> For 10 and forward yes. For older downloads, which are not part of the ASF, 
>>> we need to figure out what to do with them.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Porter
>>> Software Engineer
>>> He/Him/His
>>>
>>> IBM
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Alex Porcelli <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 at 19:18
>>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSSION] Web site maintenance
>>> Thank you, Toshiya!
>>>
>>> In regards the downloads, I'd argue that it would be better to move to
>>> Apache. As it's the new `owner` of the brands.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 9:05 PM Toshiya Kobayashi
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have filed a GH issue for the old docs migration. I'll work on this.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/2138 
>>>>
>>>> Btw, regarding old version downloads, they are still available in
>>>>
>>>> https://download.jboss.org/drools/release/ 
>>>> https://download.jboss.org/optaplanner/release/ 
>>>> https://download.jboss.org/jbpm/release/ 
>>>>
>>>> (Note: they are not drools.org etc.)
>>>>
>>>> Do we also want to move them to kie.apache.org ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Toshiya
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 11:36 PM Kennedy Bowers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Sounds like a good idea, +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025/10/07 05:07:45 Toshiya Kobayashi wrote:
>>>>>>> Maybe we could move that content under ASF and have docs supporting
>>>>>>> older versions?
>>>>>> Yes, we can.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there are no objections or concerns raised within the next few
>>>>>> days, I’ll create a GitHub issue for this task.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Toshiya
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 9:13 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Toshyia,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for the redirection, although I hear you about older version
>>>>>>> docs... and I agree. My concern is that those domains should belong to
>>>>>>> ASF, and pointing it to an external infrastructure is quite worrisome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe we could move that content under ASF and have docs supporting
>>>>>>> older versions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 12:54 AM Toshiya Kobayashi
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm happy to inform that now drools.org, optaplanner.org and jbpm.org
>>>>>>>> are redirected to https://kie.apache.org/ 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that docs subdomain (docs.drools.org, docs.optaplanner.org and
>>>>>>>> docs.jbpm.org) stay the same to provide old version documents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Toshiya
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 4:16 PM Toni Rikkola <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> We need to do the same for optaplanner.org and jbpm.org. Apache 
>>>>>>>>> requires us to have everything under kie.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Both of the websites have already been moved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Toni
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2025/07/04 01:40:16 Toshiya Kobayashi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We have migrated the contents to kie.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to ask the administrator of drools.org web server (Red 
>>>>>>>>>> Hat) to
>>>>>>>>>> redirect from https://www.drools.org       to 
>>>>>>>>>> https://kie.apache.org/       .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think this is not something like "proposal" or "vote", so I'm 
>>>>>>>>>> notifying
>>>>>>>>>> it here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If there are no objections for a few days, I'll proceed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Toshiya
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 6:09 PM Toni Rikkola <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Current status.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Everything moved or there is an existing PR pending for a move.
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1713 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The blog will stay where it is. The kie.apache.org can just have the
>>>>>>>>>>> product release and other project announcements. Everyone can blog 
>>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>>> they want and we can even link to those blogs from our Apache site.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> kie.org is pretty much just links to blogs, so nothing to move 
>>>>>>>>>>> there that
>>>>>>>>>>> is not already in kie.apache.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is a separate ticket for documentation. This only moves what 
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> worth the move from websites to the new location.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Toni
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025/04/28 07:44:50 Toni Rikkola wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Toshiya. I will move Optaplanner.
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1936 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Toni
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 6:50 AM Toshiya Kobayashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the initiative, Toni.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a parent GH issue: "Migrate KIE Websites to Apache
>>>>>>>>>>> Infrastructure"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1713 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added a sub-issue : "Migrate drools.org to kie-website" :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/1934 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Toshiya
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:23 PM Toni Rikkola
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can start the work for drools and Toshiya offered help. I can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Optaplanner.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That leaves jbpm. I know dmn had a site setup, but not sure if we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> need/want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a separate section for it in the future?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Toni
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 2:56 AM Craig Russell 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peanut here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What Toni sez.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right now, an internet search for "drools" returns links to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsolete
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drools.org <http://drools.org/      > web site, which makes it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drools
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is dead. The downloads on the site are years old. Wrong message.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd suggest to copy any current data still on drools.org <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://drools.org/      > to a section on kie.apache.org <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kie.apache.org/      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In "no time at all" search engines will notice that drools is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>> homed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until the domain expires, now redirect drools.org <
>>>>>>>>>>> http://drools.org/      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kie.apache.org <http://kie.apache.org/      > .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless this is done, the project is missing out on a lot of
>>>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> users.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for other domains that are now kie projects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2025, at 03:57, Toni Rikkola
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right now we have drools.org and kie.apache.org and I guess the
>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for every other subproject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Old sites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * They break the copyrights that Apache now has for KIE.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * They get a lot of hits and the site contents are 1.5 years 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they say the project is dead, use something else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * No updates. No mentions of the Apache releases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Can go down at any moment since this community does not fund
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New site
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * No content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * No, or minimal, resources to maintain them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the fact that it has been years. It is clear we have
>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation or man power to maintain these. So the question is
>>>>>>>>>>> what is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shortest path to victory?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is we use the domains and forward to
>>>>>>>>>>> kie.apache.org as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as possible. Right now the old domains are sending the wrong
>>>>>>>>>>> signal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sure we have a lot of ideas, but also consider where we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources to implement. For few years there has been none.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Toni Rikkola
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Craig L Russell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to