+1. Colm.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Philip Zampino <pzamp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good. I've already implemented a few patches I would like to see in > 1.0.0, and I agree that we should go through the others +1 > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:12 AM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > All - > > > > As we discussed back in November [1], we should follow up the recent > 0.14.0 > > release with a 1.0.0 with the renaming of the class packages. > > > > In addition to the package renames, we could also accommodate any fixes > or > > upgrades that would be work well toward the backward compatibility > > commitments that a 1.0.0 release implies and/or any security related > fixes. > > > > I don't anticipate more than a handful of JIRAs to be attached to this > > release. > > > > My proposal would be that we go through the rather large set of 0.15.0 > fix > > version JIRAs and determine those few that absolutely need to go into > 1.0.0 > > and defer the rest to 1.1.0. > > > > Given the holidays on the horizon, we may want to target a release date > of > > Friday 1/12 or earlier. If we keep the scope extremely tight, we can > > probably get it out earlier. > > > > thoughts? > > > > --larry > > > > 1. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/knox-dev/201711. > > mbox/%3CCACRbFyjvzAzQ%3DA-JfxYVhAD4DhABeNRBbhLPs4dPTPTtC > > 1BMNg%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
