Thanks Larry!

Colm.

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:28 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:

> Interesting, Colm.
>
> I do think that the SHOULD language provides us room to leave them there.
> I can accept it as a low priority task to clean it up though.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are not following the official Apache guidelines on archiving
> releases:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#archival
> >
> > "Each project's distribution directory
> > <http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#dist-dir> SHOULD contain
> > the latest release in each branch that is currently under development.
> When
> > development ceases on a version branch, releases of that branch SHOULD be
> > removed."
> >
> > We currently list all of the available Knox releases on the main dist
> site:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/knox/
> >
> > Really we should be "svn rm"ing all of the existing releases here apart
> > from 0.14.0. All releases are of course archived here anyway for
> posterity:
> >
> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/knox/
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
> >
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to