Thanks Larry! Colm.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 4:28 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote: > Interesting, Colm. > > I do think that the SHOULD language provides us room to leave them there. > I can accept it as a low priority task to clean it up though. > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 6:54 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <cohei...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We are not following the official Apache guidelines on archiving > releases: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#archival > > > > "Each project's distribution directory > > <http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#dist-dir> SHOULD contain > > the latest release in each branch that is currently under development. > When > > development ceases on a version branch, releases of that branch SHOULD be > > removed." > > > > We currently list all of the available Knox releases on the main dist > site: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/knox/ > > > > Really we should be "svn rm"ing all of the existing releases here apart > > from 0.14.0. All releases are of course archived here anyway for > posterity: > > > > http://archive.apache.org/dist/knox/ > > > > Colm. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Colm O hEigeartaigh > > > > Talend Community Coder > > http://coders.talend.com > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com