Ok, one last fix, promise ! Found a bug in KnoxSSO due to refactoring, just got done with the testing will commit it next hour or so to 1.0.0 and master.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > Terrific, Sandeep! > > I will spin a rc1 for 1.0.0 today. > > By the way, the v1.0.0 branch has already been created and therefore master > is open for commits of outstanding patches for 1.1.0 release. > Any changes that end up being needed in 1.0.0 branch will need to be > committed to both master and v1.0.0. > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Sandeep More <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The addition of shims is done and they seem to work as expected with some > > testing I did on them. > > We should be good to go with 1.0.0 ! > > > > Sorry for holding up the release :( > > > > Best, > > Sandeep > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Sandeep More <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I just stumbled across an issue where ClassNotFoundException can be > > thrown > > > if the service defs are not upgraded (e.g. webhdfs service definition). > > > I created KNOX-1168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1168> > to > > > address the issue and it should probably go in 1.0.0 branch, sorry :( > > > > > > I see that 1.0.0 branch has already been created, I will get this > > > committed to both 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 (master). > > > Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > > > > > Best, > > > Sandeep > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Philip Zampino <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Let's get 1.0.0 released, so we can continue with the improvements! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Sandeep More <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 > > >> > Sounds good, once we get 1.0.0 out the door we can start letting in > > the > > >> > features and bugs. > > >> > > > >> > Best, > > >> > Sandeep > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:38 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > All - > > >> > > > > >> > > Since we have descoped 1.0.0 down to just a couple doc issues, I > am > > >> > > thinking that it is time to branch for the 1.0.0 release. > > >> > > > > >> > > I will also try and spin the first rc as well. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thoughts, concerns? > > >> > > > > >> > > thanks, > > >> > > > > >> > > --larry > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
