As an aside, what is the status of the issues marked as "resolved" for
Should the resolved issues be instead marked as "fix for" 1.0.0, and the
unresolved issues moved to another version?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Phil Zampino <pzamp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick turnaround. RC2 looks good to me.
> * Downloaded and built from source (with Java 1.8.0_144)
> * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files
> * Verified GPG signature for Knox source
> * Checked CHANGES file
> * Ran Knox tests
> * Verified remote configuration management via ZooKeeper
> * Verified knoxcli for listing provider configurations and descriptors in
> ZooKeeper (KNOX-1137)
> * Verified that the relationship changes effected among descriptors and
> provider configs when Knox is
> NOT running are correctly established at Knox start-up (KNOX-1144)
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:34 AM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > A candidate for the Apache Knox 1.0.0 release is available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-1.0.0/
> > The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
> > Branch v1.0.0 (git checkout -b v1.0.0)
> > Git Tag: v1.0.0-rc2
> > The KEYS file for signature validation is available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/knox/KEYS
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Knox 1.0.0.
> > This release is nearly identical to 0.14.0 with the exception of:
> > * repackaging of the classes to remove "hadoop" from the package
> > names
> > * handful of patches for rounding out service discovery
> > and topology generation
> > * moved the Apache Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 3.0
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 Apache Knox PMC votes are cast.
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Knox 1.0.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Colm O hEigeartaigh
Talend Community Coder