[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1814?focusedWorklogId=210998&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-210998
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on KNOX-1814:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 11/Mar/19 13:50
            Start Date: 11/Mar/19 13:50
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: risdenk commented on issue #68: KNOX-1814 - Moving 
conf/data folder checking to Java layer from bash
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/68#issuecomment-471546008
 
 
   I would be careful about trying to change the permissions. Maybe we should 
WARN if the permissions don't match? Changing permissions on a filesystem from 
a start script seems really wrong.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 210998)
    Time Spent: 1h  (was: 50m)

> Move directory check to Java layer
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KNOX-1814
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-1814
>             Project: Apache Knox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Server
>            Reporter: Sandor Molnar
>            Assignee: Sandor Molnar
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently, the following folder checks exist in {{gateway.sh}}:
>  * {{conf}} directory exists and can be read?
>  * {{data}}, {{log}}, {{pid}} directories exist and can be written?
> Only the {{conf}} and {{data}} folders are used by the Java code ({{log}} and 
> {{pid}} only used in the bash script). Those directories are configurable 
> using GATEWAY_HOME in the Java layer, therefore those checks should either be 
> removed or fixed, so they take those variables into account.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to