luliu8 commented on pull request #477: URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/477#issuecomment-1006286971
fixed On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:28 PM Sandeep Moré ***@***.***> wrote: > ***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request. > > @luliu8 <https://github.com/luliu8> looks like unit tests are failing, > specifically this one > GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest.testValidWebShellRequest() with error > > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: Unable to load cache item > > at org.easymock.cglib.core.internal.LoadingCache.createEntry(LoadingCache.java:79) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.internal.LoadingCache.get(LoadingCache.java:34) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData.get(AbstractClassGenerator.java:119) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.create(AbstractClassGenerator.java:294) > at org.easymock.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createHelper(Enhancer.java:480) > at org.easymock.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.createClass(Enhancer.java:337) > at org.easymock.internal.ClassProxyFactory.createProxy(ClassProxyFactory.java:175) > at org.easymock.internal.MocksControl.createMock(MocksControl.java:98) > at org.easymock.internal.MocksControl.createMock(MocksControl.java:73) > at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.doCreateMock(PowerMock.java:2023) > at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.doMock(PowerMock.java:1970) > at org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.createMock(PowerMock.java:95) > at org.apache.knox.gateway.websockets.GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest.testValidWebShellRequest(GatewayWebsocketHandlerTest.java:74) > at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566) > at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326) > at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89) > at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147) > at org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:258) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298) > at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87) > at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134) > at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34) > at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57) > at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59) > at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137) > at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:69) > at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33) > at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:235) > at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:54) > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder (in unnamed module @0x1ba359bd) cannot access class jdk.xml.internal.SecuritySupport (in module java.xml) because module java.xml does not export jdk.xml.internal to unnamed module @0x1ba359bd > at javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.<clinit>(FactoryFinder.java:69) > at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(DocumentBuilderFactory.java:140) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.xml.XmlConfiguration.newDocumentBuilder(XmlConfiguration.java:183) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.xml.XmlConfiguration.<init>(XmlConfiguration.java:89) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.xml.XmlConfigurationFactory.getConfiguration(XmlConfigurationFactory.java:46) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.ConfigurationFactory$Factory.getConfiguration(ConfigurationFactory.java:558) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.ConfigurationFactory$Factory.getConfiguration(ConfigurationFactory.java:478) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.ConfigurationFactory.getConfiguration(ConfigurationFactory.java:322) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.reconfigure(LoggerContext.java:695) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.reconfigure(LoggerContext.java:716) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.start(LoggerContext.java:270) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.getContext(Log4jContextFactory.java:245) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.getContext(Log4jContextFactory.java:47) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager.getContext(LogManager.java:176) > at org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager.getLogger(LogManager.java:666) > at org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.log4j.audit.Log4jAuditor.<init>(Log4jAuditor.java:54) > at org.apache.knox.gateway.audit.log4j.audit.Log4jAuditService.getAuditor(Log4jAuditService.java:97) > at org.apache.knox.gateway.webshell.WebshellWebSocketAdapter.<clinit>(WebshellWebSocketAdapter.java:46) > at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:398) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.ReflectUtils.defineClass(ReflectUtils.java:467) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator.generate(AbstractClassGenerator.java:339) > at org.easymock.cglib.proxy.Enhancer.generate(Enhancer.java:492) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData$3.apply(AbstractClassGenerator.java:96) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.AbstractClassGenerator$ClassLoaderData$3.apply(AbstractClassGenerator.java:94) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.internal.LoadingCache$2.call(LoadingCache.java:54) > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) > at org.easymock.cglib.core.internal.LoadingCache.createEntry(LoadingCache.java:61) > ... 44 more > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/477#pullrequestreview-845080060>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOT5G5A5DEH6CJEXAKURDU3UUSZW3ANCNFSM5BSCERLQ> > . > Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS > <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> > or Android > <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>. > > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
