kardolus commented on code in PR #914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/914#discussion_r1626235321


##########
gateway-server/src/main/java/org/apache/knox/gateway/GatewayServlet.java:
##########
@@ -277,4 +278,34 @@ public Enumeration<String> getInitParameterNames() {
       return config.getInitParameterNames();
     }
   }
+
+  private Exception sanitizeException(Exception e) {
+    if (e == null || e.getMessage() == null) {
+      return e;
+    }
+    if (!isErrorMessageSanitizationEnabled || e.getMessage() == null) {
+      return e;
+    }
+    String sanitizedMessage = 
e.getMessage().replaceAll("\\b(?:\\d{1,3}\\.){3}\\d{1,3}\\b", "[hidden]");
+    return createNewException(e, sanitizedMessage);

Review Comment:
   @moresandeep @pzampino I have some concerns regarding potential breaking 
changes. Specifically, I'm not certain if there are users who might be 
utilizing `GatewayServlet` as if it were a library. If that's the case, 
changing the exception signature could lead to breaking changes for them. This 
is because, by introducing a new `SanitizedKnoxException`, we would be altering 
the types of exceptions that upstream code is expected to catch. Currently, 
throwing back the same exception type ensures backward compatibility and 
constitutes a non-breaking change.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@knox.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to