Hi All, I also support the idea of the v3.0.0 release. I'd be happy to take on the release manager responsibilities for this version if it is possible.
+1 Regards, Tamas larry mccay <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. júl. 20., H, 18:52): > Great idea, @Phil Zampino <[email protected]> ! > I think the LDAP Proxy Server feature will be landing as well. > > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 11:45 AM Sandeep Moré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Phil for starting the discussion! I agree it is a good time for > > v3.0.0 release! > > > > Best, > > Sandeep > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 3:26 PM Phil Zampino <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > It seems to me about time for another Knox release. We've made a number > > of > > > changes and improvements, including things which are not > > > backward-compatible, hence the move to v3.0.0. > > > > > > Among the numerous improvements > > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3223?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0%20order%20by%20updated%20DESC > > >, > > > we've: > > > > > > - Moved to a JDK17 build > > > - Upgraded the UIs > > > - Added RemoteAuth Provider > > > - Added APIKEY and CLIENTID token API extensions > > > - Implemented ICEBERG-REST service enhancements > > > - Added K8s support features > > > - Added Oracle database support as a TokenStateService backend > > > - Removed deprecated TokenStateService implementations > > > - Addressed numerous CVEs by way of dependency upgrades > > > > > > (Feel free to point out key improvements I've missed.) > > > > > > We have several open PRs, and we'll need to decide which of them must > be > > > included in v3.0.0 > > > I'm personally on the fence about the servlet API migration PR > (pull/1213 > > > <https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/1213>), so I am interested in > what > > > others think about that one in particular. > > > > > > I think we should work toward a v3.0.0 release by the end of this month > > if > > > possible. > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Phil > > >
