I'm planning to cut the branch tomorrow so KnoxIDF can be made available on master.
Regards, Tamas Sandor Molnar <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. júl. 22., Sze, 13:46): > Hi Phil! > > +1 from me, I'm in favor of moving toward a 3.0.0 release. > > Going through the open PRs, I'd like to see #1317 and #1318 merged before > we cut the release. > > Once those are in, I'd suggest we cut the release branch and continue > working on master, with the next version on master being 3.1.0 (as > recommended). > > This would let us not only ship 3.0.0 — an important milestone in itself — > but also make KnoxIDF available on master. > > Here's my +1. > > Cheers, > Sandor > > On 2026/07/17 19:26:24 Phil Zampino wrote: > > It seems to me about time for another Knox release. We've made a number > of > > changes and improvements, including things which are not > > backward-compatible, hence the move to v3.0.0. > > > > Among the numerous improvements > > < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-3223?filter=-1&jql=project%20%3D%20KNOX%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0%20order%20by%20updated%20DESC > >, > > we've: > > > > - Moved to a JDK17 build > > - Upgraded the UIs > > - Added RemoteAuth Provider > > - Added APIKEY and CLIENTID token API extensions > > - Implemented ICEBERG-REST service enhancements > > - Added K8s support features > > - Added Oracle database support as a TokenStateService backend > > - Removed deprecated TokenStateService implementations > > - Addressed numerous CVEs by way of dependency upgrades > > > > (Feel free to point out key improvements I've missed.) > > > > We have several open PRs, and we'll need to decide which of them must be > > included in v3.0.0 > > I'm personally on the fence about the servlet API migration PR (pull/1213 > > <https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/1213>), so I am interested in what > > others think about that one in particular. > > > > I think we should work toward a v3.0.0 release by the end of this month > if > > possible. > > > > What do you all think? > > > > Thanks, > > Phil > > >
