+1 for Kevin to be the PMC chair.

Kevin has been leading,  managing, contributing impressively for Knox.
Of course Larry is also  great.

Thanks
Dilli


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:55 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am seconding Chris' the nomination of Kevin as the PMC chair.
> He has successfully led this project through the incubation period and will
> be great moving it forward as a TLP.
>
> For reference here is a description of the responsibilities of the chair:
>
> Repsonsibility to write a board report every month (to start out with)
> and then quarterly after 3 months. That report should contain things
> like shown here:
>
> http://community.apache.org/boardreport.html
>
> The chair is also responsible for:
>
> 1. Keeping committee-info.txt [1] up to date with PMC additions
> and occasionally removals.
> 2. Requesting a board@ ACK for the addition of new PMC members
> (ACK generates 72 hour hold before adding people)
> 3. Managing (with appropriate delegation) bringing on new committers
> and PMC members - that means:
>   a. Emailing them and inviting them to the committee after VOTE'ing
>      (not explicitly required, and I like it when the nominator takes
>       care of this, but in the end the buck stops with the chair)
>   b. Making sure their new account request is done using acqreq [2]
>   c. Checking their ICLA is received [3].
> 4. Interacting with the board (you have the right as an officer to
>    attend board meetings at that point. Your board report is committed
>    to the board agenda here [4].
>
> +1 for Kevin.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:50 PM, larry mccay <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > HA - thanks, Chris.
> >
> > Yes, that outline sounds fine and we will start the process of selecting
> a
> > chair.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Either Kevin or you Larry (yes you) ;) I am +1 for either
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On Oct 22, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "larry mccay" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hey Chris -
> >> >
> >> > I suspect that you meant Kevin as your nomination.
> >> >
> >> > thanks,
> >> >
> >> > --larry
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey Larry,
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks. An outline of the way the graduation process works is
> >> >>
> >> >> here:
> >> >>
> >> >> 0. DISCUSS and pick a chair (my nomination is for Larry, I think he's
> >> >> earned it and will do great)
> >> >> Chair responsibilities:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mesos-dev/201306.mbox/%3
> >> >> ccdcf7cff.d329e%[email protected]%3E
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. Draft a resolution, see here for example:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-mesos-dev/201306.mbox/%3
> >> >> ccdd80db7.d5f8a%[email protected]%3E
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> 2. [VOTE] on dev@knox for resolution (looking for 3 mentor/IPMC +1s)
> >> - let
> >> >> it run for a week
> >> >> 3. [VOTE] on [email protected] for resolution (looking for 3 mentor/IPMC
> >> +1s
> >> >> and more +1s than -1s) - let it run for a week
> >> >> 4. Paste resolution into board report for next meeting
> >> >>
> >> >> Sound good?
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Chris
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: larry mccay <[email protected]>
> >> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:24 AM
> >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation (was Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release
> >> Apache
> >> >> Knox (Incubator) 0.3.0 (PASSED))
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hey Guys -
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It seems that our next step involves submitting a motion to the ASF
> >> board
> >> >>> that re-identifies our scope, mission and charter.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Are we at that point in the process now and do we have access to
> >> previous
> >> >>> motions to use as an example?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I assume that we don't need a separate vote for this?
> >> >>> It seems that we have three +1's from IPMC members.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> From:
> >> >>
> >>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html#Graduation
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "For projects aiming to be a Top-Level-Project (TLP), you have an
> >> >>> additional obstacle, namely the ASF Board. While the ASF Board might
> >> be
> >> >>> your Sponsor, this does not mean they have formally accepted you as
> a
> >> TLP.
> >> >>> To establish a TLP you need to draft a board motion that identifies
> >> the
> >> >>> project scope, mission and charter. You can submit the motion to the
> >> Board
> >> >>> using the board at apache dot org email address. Well-prepared
> >> projects
> >> >>> will have already developed contacts with members of the Board so
> this
> >> >>> should not be a surprise agenda item. Keep in mind that the Board
> can
> >> >>> approve your motion as supplied, amend it, or reject it. If you are
> >> >>> rejected then you need to sort this out with the Incubator PMC and
> >> allies
> >> >>> you have developed during the incubation process. In other words,
> for
> >> a
> >> >>> TLP
> >> >>> objective the Incubator PMC okay is only half of the story."
> >> >>>
> >> >>> thanks,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --larry
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Alan Gates <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> +1.  I think you guys were turbo fast learners of the Apache way,
> and
> >> >>>> are
> >> >>>> ready to run the project as a PMC.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Alan.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Great work Kevin!
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> So, it's time to start talking graduation.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> 3 releases. New committer/PPMC members added. Great job discussing
> >> >>>>> on list. I don't think there's anything really left for the
> >> Incubator.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thoughts?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>> Chris
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>>>> From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
> >> >>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
> >> >>>> <[email protected]
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 5:16 PM
> >> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
> >> >>>>> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Knox (Incubator) 0.3.0
> >> (PASSED)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> More than 72 hours have passed and the current vote thread is
> >> >>>> considered
> >> >>>>>> concluded and passes with the following resolution:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Three +1 binding votes from the following IPMCs:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> * Devaraj Das
> >> >>>>>> * Chris A. Mattmann
> >> >>>>>> * Mahadev Konar
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Two +1 binding votes from the following PPMCs:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> * Kevin Minder
> >> >>>>>> * Larry McCay
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Four +1 non-binding votes
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> * Dilli Arumugam
> >> >>>>>> * Maksim Kononenko
> >> >>>>>> * Vladimir Tkhir
> >> >>>>>> * Sergey Balan
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Zero -1 votes
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I will notify general@incubator and wait an additional 72 hours
> >> for
> >> >>>>>> feedback before beginning the process of moving the release
> >> >>>> artifacts to
> >> >>>>>> the mirrors.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> For reference here is the link to the [VOTE] thread
> >> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/knox-dev/201310.mbox/%3C5255AC37
> >> >>>> .
> >> >>>>>> [email protected]%3E
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Kevin.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> >>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >> >>>> entity
> >> >>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> >>>> confidential,
> >> >>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> the
> >> >>>> reader
> >> >>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >> >>>> notified
> >> >>>>>> that
> >> >>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> >>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> >> have
> >> >>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> >>>>>> immediately
> >> >>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >> >>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >> >>>> entity to
> >> >>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >> confidential,
> >> >>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> >> >>>> reader
> >> >>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >> notified
> >> >>>> that
> >> >>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >> >>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> >> >>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >> >>>> immediately
> >> >>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to