Dan,

Thank you for fast turn-around and picking up that update!


Best regards,

Alexey


On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Dan Burkert <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the heads up; I made sure I got everything that touched /docs
> but didn't think about header only changes!
>
> - Dan
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Alexey Serbin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > I saw there was a doc-only change cherry-picked into the 1.0.1: Adar's
> > update on master migration doc, b783627.
> >
> > On that note, if you haven't cut RC yet, consider cherry-picking just
> > another doc-only update: b70d362.  It's not crucial for the
> functionality,
> > but it might be useful for people using the Kudu C++ client API in RWYW
> > scenarios.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alexey
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Dan Burkert <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've pulled in all of the doc fixups between 1.0.0 and now into
> 1.0.x.  I
> > > cherry-picked KUDU-1681, but none of the other I listed yesterday,
> since
> > > the consensus seems to be that they are extremely unlikely to occur on
> a
> > > real cluster.  I'll be cutting the RC later this afternoon.
> > >
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Dan Burkert <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'll make sure we release a new build of the website since a lot of
> > > docs
> > > > > have changed.  My understanding is that this can be decoupled from
> > the
> > > > > actual release branch, so doc-only changes don't need to be
> > backported.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > In my experience due to version numbers being in embedded in the
> > javadocs
> > > > and elsewhere it's much easier to push the docs from the release tag,
> > or
> > > at
> > > > least the release branch even if you have to cherry-pick docs past
> the
> > > tag.
> > > > Otherwise the docs will say they are for Kudu version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> or
> > > > whatever it currently is on the master branch.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to