New committer votes already there actually, soon these will not be the issue. Please help to vote.
As I mentioned, that "staging" repo just for temporary purpose to keep it as simple as possible to avoid additional efforts, but definitely will switch to the main repo soon. Thanks. Luke Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han 2015-03-18 16:02 GMT-07:00 Ankur Bansal <[email protected]>: > +1 on Git Pull Requests. > We should use same process for regular contributors as the one we advocate > for new contributors. > Pull request should be a standard practice for the very purpose. > I suggest getting rid of https://github.com/KylinOLAP/Kylin all together. > > - Ankur > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > How do people feel about pull requests and the github mode of > development? > > I agree with Ted that regular contributors should become committers, but > > for others, or even for committers who are not ready to commit to trunk, > > github forks and pull requests are a good way of working in public and > > getting feedback early. Anyone who wants to contribute to kylin could > > easily create a github account. > > > > Julian > > > > > > On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Luke Han <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> The other one is our staging code repo to simplify development since > > many > > >> of our team members do not have push privileges to Apache one yet > (This > > >> approach will be changed anytime without notification). > > >> > > > > > > This is not a good practice. Effectively, what is happening is that > > > development is happening in private with occasional burps to the public > > > repo. > > > > > > If you have lots of people that you trust to be committers, you should > > > start a vote to make them committers. Having more committers is not a > > > problem... it is a good thing. > > > > >
