Thanks Ted and Owen, the LICENSE file already updated, there's should not too binary files be included from dependency or our code already (excluded, but need double check when we generate release package).
There are some UT issue to fix before run release goal. Thanks. Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han 2015-04-27 23:37 GMT+08:00 Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>: > You should also consider removing as many of the binary files as possible. > Apache releases need to be verifiable and it is difficult to verify the > contents of a binary file. You are much better off if you can replace the > binary file with a script that regenerates the file. > > Thanks, > Owen > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Luke Han <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > After great help from all of you, the apache release made some > > progress: > > 1. License cleanup, there's no GPL library, but how about MIT? should > > we add some notice about such dependency? > > 2. Apache RAT check passed > > 3. There's no binary package will be include in the release package . > > 4. Some of UT failed which will be fixed soon > > 5. JIRA is cleaning up now, some of JIRA ticket may not associated > with > > commit since there are some imported from previous github.com issues, > some > > of them are out of date. Most of new commits will associated correct JIRA > > > > Please help to run on your side if possible, and please report any > > issue here. > > > > If you found any issue or problem, or previous experience with other > > projects, please leave your comments also. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Luke > > >
