All UT and RAT check done, looks like it's good time to process next step. Will send out discussion thread when I uploaded release package tonight.
Thanks. Luke Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han 2015-04-28 20:09 GMT+08:00 Luke Han <[email protected]>: > Thanks Ted and Owen, the LICENSE file already updated, there's should not > too binary files be included from dependency or our code already (excluded, > but need double check when we generate release package). > > There are some UT issue to fix before run release goal. > > Thanks. > > > Best Regards! > --------------------- > > Luke Han > > 2015-04-27 23:37 GMT+08:00 Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>: > >> You should also consider removing as many of the binary files as possible. >> Apache releases need to be verifiable and it is difficult to verify the >> contents of a binary file. You are much better off if you can replace the >> binary file with a script that regenerates the file. >> >> Thanks, >> Owen >> >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Luke Han <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > After great help from all of you, the apache release made some >> > progress: >> > 1. License cleanup, there's no GPL library, but how about MIT? >> should >> > we add some notice about such dependency? >> > 2. Apache RAT check passed >> > 3. There's no binary package will be include in the release package >> . >> > 4. Some of UT failed which will be fixed soon >> > 5. JIRA is cleaning up now, some of JIRA ticket may not associated >> with >> > commit since there are some imported from previous github.com issues, >> some >> > of them are out of date. Most of new commits will associated correct >> JIRA >> > >> > Please help to run on your side if possible, and please report any >> > issue here. >> > >> > If you found any issue or problem, or previous experience with other >> > projects, please leave your comments also. >> > >> > Thank you very much. >> > >> > Luke >> > >> > >
