Agree to Shaofeng, the fast cubing is not fully tested yet with real case and huge data. Which will be released into further version once we have more confident. The 1.0 is indicate that current Kylin version is stable enough with real cases certification, eBay and other deployment. Then we could move on to bring different features to coming releases.
If there's no other concern or comments, I will start to working on new release with 1.0 as release version number. Thanks. Best Regards! --------------------- Luke Han On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Shi, Shaofeng <[email protected]> wrote: > The new cubing algorithm hasn’t been tested by lots of real cases; Before > release it, at least we need deploy it into eBay production env and run > for some time; The current cubing algorithm is very stable, which matches > the 1.0 target; > > On 8/6/15, 10:43 PM, "Huang Hua" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >It's good to know that we will see the kylin 1.0 in the near future. > >I agree that the current 0.7 branch has quite stable features and > >performance. > >But I think it would be much greater if the fast cubing algorithm can be > >incorporated in kylin 1.0 release. > > > >For concerns regarding documentation, I don't see much trouble for now > >cause the OLAP concepts can be googled quite easily and are also well > >explained on the web. > > > >Thanks. > >Hua > >> -----邮件原件----- > >> 发件人: dev-return-3488- > >> [email protected] [mailto:dev-return- > >> [email protected]] 代表 Luke > >> Han > >> 发送时间: 2015年8月6日 19:10 > >> 收件人: [email protected] > >> 主题: Re: [Discuss] New release version number of Kylin > >> > >> There are already some documentation about this, like terminology and > >>tips > >> on the web. > >> Even there's already efforts by Luwei to bring more better tutorial > >>with such > >> demo and sample. > >> > >> Agree to improve them one by one, but I don't think these are block > >>issue:-) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Best Regards! > >> --------------------- > >> > >> Luke Han > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > +0 The document of 0.7 branch is not good enough from my point of > >>view. > >> > Especially certain basic cube concepts like hierarchy, aggregation > >> > groups, are not explained with example. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:43 PM, 周千昊 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I think after 0.7.1 and 0.7.2, we are confident to release a pretty > >> > mature > >> > > version. > >> > > One most important thing is that with the improved new cubing > >> > > algorithm, users will be so happy to see the total cubing time > >>reduced by > >> 30% - 50%. > >> > > > >> > > hongbin ma <[email protected]>于2015年8月6日周四 下午 > >> 12:01写道： > >> > > > >> > > > It think it's a good idea to release 0.7 branch as Kylin 1.0 The > >> > > > reasons are threefold: > >> > > > > >> > > > 1. 0.7 branch is getting mature in cubing job scheduling, REST > >> > > > server, query engine, even documents. Complete OLAP solution can > >> > > > be build with > >> > > it. > >> > > > > >> > > > 2. 0.7 branch contains most of bugs in latest code. > >> > > > > >> > > > 3. 0.8 branch is too early to be announced as a release > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Luke Han <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Seshu, > >> > > > > No, release current 0.7.3 as v1.0. 0.8 still to early to > >> > > > > release > >> > > since > >> > > > > there are many refactoring. it should be mark as 2.0;-) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Luke > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Best Regards! > >> > > > > --------------------- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Luke Han > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Luke, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Are you thinking of renaming the current 0.8 branch as 1.0? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards > >> > > > > > Seshu > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 8/5/15, 8:21 AM, "Luke Han" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >Hi all, > >> > > > > > > As several rounds testing and 2 releases, we are > >> > > > > > >comfortable > >> > to > >> > > > say > >> > > > > > >the current > >> > > > > > >version of Kylin is quite stable than the beginning when it > >> > > > > > >join incubating. > >> > > > > > > With some cases, not only inside eBay also other > >> > > > > > >deployments > >> > on > >> > > > > > >production outside eBay, it already proved the quality and > >> > > performance > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > > >Apache Kylin. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > So I would like to raise a discussion here to make next > >> > release > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > >*v1.0 > >> > > > > > >*(0.7.3-snapshot now) which should be released in August, > >> > > > > > >since > >> > the > >> > > > > > >maturity of code base, product is good enough. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Please kindly help to leave your inputs and comments > >>here. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >Best Regards! > >> > > > > > >--------------------- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >Luke Han > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Regards, > >> > > > > >> > > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾* > >> > > > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io > >> > > > Github: https://github.com/binmahone > >> > > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Best Regard > >> > > ZhouQianhao > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >
