Agreed.
And we should release the fast cubing feature once it has been fully tested

Luke Han <[email protected]>于2015年8月10日周一 上午11:20写道:

> Agree to Shaofeng, the fast cubing is not fully tested yet with real case
> and huge data.
> Which will be released into further version once we have more confident.
> The 1.0 is indicate that current Kylin version is stable enough with real
> cases
> certification, eBay and other deployment.
> Then we could move on to bring different features to coming releases.
>
> If there's no other concern or comments, I will start to working on new
> release
> with 1.0 as release version number.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best Regards!
> ---------------------
>
> Luke Han
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Shi, Shaofeng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The new cubing algorithm hasn’t been tested by lots of real cases; Before
> > release it, at least we need deploy it into eBay production env and run
> > for some time; The current cubing algorithm is very stable, which matches
> > the 1.0 target;
> >
> > On 8/6/15, 10:43 PM, "Huang Hua" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >It's good to know that we will see the kylin 1.0 in the near future.
> > >I agree that the current 0.7 branch has quite stable features and
> > >performance.
> > >But I think it would be much greater if the fast cubing algorithm can be
> > >incorporated in kylin 1.0 release.
> > >
> > >For concerns regarding documentation, I don't see much trouble for now
> > >cause the OLAP concepts can be googled quite easily and are also well
> > >explained on the web.
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >Hua
> > >> -----邮件原件-----
> > >> 发件人: dev-return-3488-
> > >> [email protected] [mailto:
> dev-return-
> > >> [email protected]] 代表 Luke
> > >> Han
> > >> 发送时间: 2015年8月6日 19:10
> > >> 收件人: [email protected]
> > >> 主题: Re: [Discuss] New release version number of Kylin
> > >>
> > >> There are already some documentation about this, like terminology and
> > >>tips
> > >> on the web.
> > >> Even there's already efforts by Luwei to bring more better tutorial
> > >>with such
> > >> demo and sample.
> > >>
> > >> Agree to improve them one by one, but I don't think these are block
> > >>issue:-)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards!
> > >> ---------------------
> > >>
> > >> Luke Han
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Li Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +0  The document of 0.7 branch is not good enough from my point of
> > >>view.
> > >> > Especially certain basic cube concepts like hierarchy, aggregation
> > >> > groups, are not explained with example.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:43 PM, 周千昊 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I think after 0.7.1 and 0.7.2, we are confident to release a
> pretty
> > >> > mature
> > >> > > version.
> > >> > > One most important thing is that with the improved new cubing
> > >> > > algorithm, users will be so happy to see the total cubing time
> > >>reduced by
> > >> 30% - 50%.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > hongbin ma <[email protected]>于2015年8月6日周四 下午
> > >> 12:01写道:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > It think it's a good idea to release 0.7 branch as Kylin 1.0 The
> > >> > > > reasons are threefold:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 1. 0.7 branch is getting mature in cubing job scheduling, REST
> > >> > > > server, query engine, even documents. Complete OLAP solution can
> > >> > > > be build with
> > >> > > it.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2. 0.7 branch contains most of bugs in latest code.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 3. 0.8 branch is too early to be announced as a release
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Luke Han <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Seshu,
> > >> > > > >    No, release current 0.7.3 as v1.0. 0.8 still to early to
> > >> > > > > release
> > >> > > since
> > >> > > > > there are many refactoring. it should be mark as 2.0;-)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >    Thanks.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Luke
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best Regards!
> > >> > > > > ---------------------
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Luke Han
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Adunuthula, Seshu <
> > >> > > [email protected]>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Luke,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Are you thinking of renaming the current 0.8 branch as 1.0?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Regards
> > >> > > > > > Seshu
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On 8/5/15, 8:21 AM, "Luke Han" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >Hi all,
> > >> > > > > > >     As several rounds testing and 2 releases, we are
> > >> > > > > > >comfortable
> > >> > to
> > >> > > > say
> > >> > > > > > >the current
> > >> > > > > > >version of Kylin is quite stable than the beginning when it
> > >> > > > > > >join incubating.
> > >> > > > > > >     With some cases, not only inside eBay also other
> > >> > > > > > >deployments
> > >> > on
> > >> > > > > > >production outside eBay, it already proved the quality and
> > >> > > performance
> > >> > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > >Apache Kylin.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >     So I would like to raise a discussion here to make
> next
> > >> > release
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > > >*v1.0
> > >> > > > > > >*(0.7.3-snapshot now) which should be released in August,
> > >> > > > > > >since
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > > > >maturity of code base, product is good enough.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >      Please kindly help to leave your inputs and comments
> > >>here.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >      Thanks.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >Best Regards!
> > >> > > > > > >---------------------
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >Luke Han
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > > Regards,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > *Bin Mahone | 马洪宾*
> > >> > > > Apache Kylin: http://kylin.io
> > >> > > > Github: https://github.com/binmahone
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Best Regard
> > >> > > ZhouQianhao
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
-- 
Best Regard
ZhouQianhao

Reply via email to