Hello Olivier, see my comments inline.
Olivier Hallot a écrit : > Hi, > Sorry to jump in so late... > > Pootle seems to be an interesting tool for pt-BR as well... but > before I ask to put pt-BR in it, I'll appreciate to have a glimpse > into it's future in the project. So, will pootle be the official > translation tool in the future or is there another tool under > investigation. If affirmative, why so many languages are out of it... Because it's not the official tool... :-) NLC/L10N teams use the tool they want. A majority of them use Pootle, which makes it a tool worth investigating, nothing more, nothing less > > What are the advantages and drawbacks for using pootle, specially for > editing and typing?. So far I was using po/pot with kbabel, but I tend > to think that tool needs improvement on big jobs such as the latest > translation update (2.4). Will pootle help us there besides not having > to deal with sdf files...? You will still have to deal with sdf files anyway, because our existing process still require an output with sdf files. What Pootle brings is mostly ease of use, but once again it does not mean you cannot find the same comfort with other tools. Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
