Hi Sophie,
thank you for the clarifications, please see my comments below:
From what I remember of the SCA discussions, it is now mandatory for all
the l10n contributors. But I thought only for translators, not for
reviewers.
It really depends on what the reviewer exactly does.. If the revier only
provided feedabck on does not change anything in the files
himself/herself, he/she is only recommended to submit the SCA. If a
reviewer does carry out terminology changes, makes corrections to the
files, I see his/her work not very different from a translator who
contributes back to the code.
See point 3 of the FAQ
-----------------
3. Do I have to fill out a SCA?
Yes, if you intend to contribute source code or other materials
which are intended to be compiled or otherwise integrated with the
OpenOffice.org product, regardless of the size of the contribution
(e.g., including contributions of 10 lines or less). However we
encourage all contributors to the OpenOffice.org website domain,
including the wiki, to fill out the SCA, as it streamlines the process
for all.
------------------
So now, only documentation and extensions (may be also templates) are
not covered by the SCA.
Kind Regards,
rafaella
