Cancelling this release vote as there are licensing issues with this release

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Raju Bairishetti <[email protected]>
wrote:

> @Srikanth, Please let me know if you find any license issues? I feel like
> licenses of all dependencies in lens-ui module are compatible with Apache
> License. Please update me on rat check issues as well if there are any.
>
> @Amareshwari, Sure. I will give a try.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Yash Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 Amareshwari/Srikanth.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:12 AM, amareshwarisr . <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Agree with Srikanth.
>> >
>> > -1 (Binding)
>> >
>> > Seems the zip created has node and node-modules folders.
>> >
>> > Raju, try regenerating from same tag and check. If it still includes
>> those
>> > folders, some build changes might be required to skip those folders.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Amareshwari
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Was able to build and run all test cases from source distribution.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Puneet Gupta
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan <
>> > [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Looks like compiled node modules are included in the source tar ball
>> > > > (under lens-ui). I think this has to be respun.
>> > > >
>> > > > -1 binding
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan
>> > > >
>> > > > > From: [email protected]
>> > > > > To: [email protected]
>> > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
>> > > > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:42:27 +0530
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Checked Signatures & checksums and found them to be ok.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There seems to be licensing issues around lens-ui module. On
>> cursory
>> > > rat
>> > > > check, there seemed many violations. Will do a more thorough check
>> and
>> > > > record my vote.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards
>> > > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > From: [email protected]
>> > > > > > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:33:51 +0800
>> > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta
>> > > > > > To: [email protected]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache
>> Lens
>> > > > > > 2.4.0-beta release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The commit id is 03e1697535970b4deb75eed13a7a98b939c281d6
>> > > > > > :http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lens/commit/03e16975
>> > > > > > This corresponds to the tag: apache-lens-2.4.0-beta
>> > > > > > :
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lens.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta
>> > > > > > Release archives (tar.gz/.zip), signature, and checksums are
>> > > > > > here:*
>> > > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/
>> > > > > > <
>> > > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/
>> > > >*
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > You can find the KEYS file
>> > > > > > here:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lens/KEYS
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The release candidate consists of the following source
>> distribution
>> > > > > > archive:apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip
>> > > > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/%3Chttps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip%3E
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions
>> are
>> > > > > > provided for user convenience at the same
>> > > > > > location:apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz
>> > > > > > <<
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz
>> > > > >>The
>> > > > > > licensing of bundled bits in the archives are documented
>> > > > > > athttps://
>> > > > cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LENS/Licensing+in+Apache+Lens
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Nexus staging url:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelens-1007/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Release notes available
>> > > > > > athttps://
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315923&version=12333087
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > > [ ] 0 no opinion
>> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 from my side for the release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > For folks not familiar with vetting a release, please refer to
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > Raju Bairishetti,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > www.lazada.com <http://www.inmobi.com/>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > _____________________________________________________________
>> > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for
>> > the
>> > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
>> > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally
>> > privileged
>> > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
>> > notified
>> > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in
>> > reliance
>> > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
>> > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
>> notify
>> > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from
>> your
>> > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete
>> > transmission
>> > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay
>> in
>> > its
>> > > receipt.
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Raju Bairishetti,
>
> www.lazada.com
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Raju Bairishetti,

www.lazada.com

Reply via email to