Hi Raju, I have updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-868?focusedCommentId=15014148&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15014148 with more details.
Rat check came out clean after the node & node_modules have been removed. Binary tar ball looked good as well. Regards Srikanth Sundarrajan > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:35:56 +0800 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta > To: [email protected] > > @Srikanth, Please let me know if you find any license issues? I feel like > licenses of all dependencies in lens-ui module are compatible with Apache > License. Please update me on rat check issues as well if there are any. > > @Amareshwari, Sure. I will give a try. > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Yash Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 Amareshwari/Srikanth. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:12 AM, amareshwarisr . <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Agree with Srikanth. > > > > > > -1 (Binding) > > > > > > Seems the zip created has node and node-modules folders. > > > > > > Raju, try regenerating from same tag and check. If it still includes > > those > > > folders, some build changes might be required to skip those folders. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Amareshwari > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Puneet Gupta <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Was able to build and run all test cases from source distribution. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Puneet Gupta > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Looks like compiled node modules are included in the source tar ball > > > > > (under lens-ui). I think this has to be respun. > > > > > > > > > > -1 binding > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan > > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta > > > > > > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:42:27 +0530 > > > > > > > > > > > > Checked Signatures & checksums and found them to be ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > There seems to be licensing issues around lens-ui module. On > > cursory > > > > rat > > > > > check, there seemed many violations. Will do a more thorough check > > and > > > > > record my vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Srikanth Sundarrajan > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:33:51 +0800 > > > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.4.0-beta > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Lens > > > > > > > 2.4.0-beta release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The commit id is 03e1697535970b4deb75eed13a7a98b939c281d6 > > > > > > > :http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/lens/commit/03e16975 > > > > > > > This corresponds to the tag: apache-lens-2.4.0-beta > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lens.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta > > > > > > > Release archives (tar.gz/.zip), signature, and checksums are > > > > > > > here:* > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/ > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/ > > > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the KEYS file > > > > > > > here:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/lens/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The release candidate consists of the following source > > distribution > > > > > > > archive:apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/%3Chttps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-source-release.zip%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, the following supplementary binary distributions are > > > > > > > provided for user convenience at the same > > > > > > > location:apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz > > > > > > > << > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lens/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-rc0/apache-lens-2.4.0-beta-bin.tar.gz > > > > > >>The > > > > > > > licensing of bundled bits in the archives are documented > > > > > > > athttps:// > > > > > cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LENS/Licensing+in+Apache+Lens > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nexus staging url: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelens-1007/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Release notes available > > > > > > > athttps:// > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315923&version=12333087 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > > > [ ] 0 no opinion > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 from my side for the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For folks not familiar with vetting a release, please refer to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Raju Bairishetti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.lazada.com <http://www.inmobi.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > _____________________________________________________________ > > > > The information contained in this communication is intended solely for > > > the > > > > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others > > > > authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally > > > privileged > > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby > > > notified > > > > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in > > > reliance > > > > on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be > > > > unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please > > notify > > > > us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your > > > > system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete > > > transmission > > > > of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in > > > its > > > > receipt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Raju Bairishetti, > > www.lazada.com
