> On May 25, 2016, 5:54 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/WeightCostSelector.java,
> >  lines 46-48
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47777/diff/1/?file=1392428#file1392428line46>
> >
> >     Better to check explicitly is debug logs are enabled before going into 
> > this loop . In most cases this loop can be skipped.
> 
> Anshul Gupta wrote:
>     Added check for whether debug logs are enabled.
>     Added driver ratio in the debug logs.
> 
> Puneet Gupta wrote:
>     Did not find the check in latest path . Please check

The earlier diff wasn't created properly.
Added at Line 51 of WeightedQueryCostDriverSelector


> On May 25, 2016, 5:54 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/WeightCostSelector.java,
> >  line 51
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47777/diff/1/?file=1392428#file1392428line51>
> >
> >     Should we optimize in case only one driver is selected ? We can skip 
> > all the extra processing in this case
> 
> Anshul Gupta wrote:
>     Optimized for the same.
> 
> Puneet Gupta wrote:
>     Did not find it in latest patch.

Added


- Anshul


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47777/#review134702
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 26, 2016, 10:07 a.m., Anshul Gupta wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 26, 2016, 10:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-661
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-661
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added Weighted selector
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/driver/cube/TestMinCostSelector.java 
> 82672294fcbf462db1fd75f00e796d5dae9d2c22 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/LensConfConstants.java
>  85f54d1f835f86dd6122a987525853e0ffa9488c 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/WeightedQueryCostDriverSelector.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/TestMinCostSelector.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> lens-server-api/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/server/api/driver/TestWeightedCostSelector.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47777/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Here's the reactor summary after running mvn clean package
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Lens Server ........................................ SUCCESS [11:32 
> min]
> [INFO] Lens client ........................................ SUCCESS [01:49 
> min]
> [INFO] Lens CLI ........................................... SUCCESS [02:02 
> min]
> [INFO] Lens Examples ...................................... SUCCESS [  8.430 
> s]
> [INFO] Lens Ship Jars to Distributed Cache ................ SUCCESS [  2.801 
> s]
> [INFO] Lens Distribution .................................. SUCCESS [ 21.429 
> s]
> [INFO] Lens ML Lib ........................................ SUCCESS [02:28 
> min]
> [INFO] Lens ML Ext Distribution ........................... SUCCESS [ 20.690 
> s]
> [INFO] Lens Regression .................................... SUCCESS [  9.313 
> s]
> [INFO] Lens UI ............................................ SUCCESS [ 14.163 
> s]
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 19:10 min
> [INFO] Finished at: 2016-05-24T20:31:02+05:30
> [INFO] Final Memory: 103M/466M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anshul Gupta
> 
>

Reply via email to