> On June 1, 2016, 7:54 a.m., Puneet Gupta wrote:
> > lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/QueryExecutionServiceImpl.java,
> >  line 3139
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/47776/diff/1/?file=1392425#file1392425line3139>
> >
> >     is it possible to make do with the other log ? 
> >     
> >     This can be inferred based on "query not allowed to launch" and "query 
> > lauched".

Wanted to know when a query comes back to queued from waiting. This will help 
in debugging the reasons why a query didn't come out to queued from waiting.


- Rajat


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47776/#review135747
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 31, 2016, 8:09 p.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47776/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 31, 2016, 8:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1151
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1151
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Current logs don't give much info and for debugging why a query took so much 
> time in queue would be helpful to understand whether or not the wait time of 
> a query is valid.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/QueryExecutionServiceImpl.java
>  1b3a7c0f6dd9949d313d7c5920d0f0f1dcd18c0b 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/collect/UnioningWaitingQueriesSelector.java
>  8db059e8f9aaa7d83c4b578608f183d554e40fd0 
>   
> lens-server/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/server/query/constraint/DefaultQueryLaunchingConstraintsChecker.java
>  2decf42ec9f06ef9019af24bf64c749edd484cff 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47776/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal
> 
>

Reply via email to