----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61938/#review184040 -----------------------------------------------------------
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java Lines 937 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61938/#comment260041> We should make sure participatingUpdatePeriods does not have any update period that has zero partitions. Should line 536 " this.participatingUpdatePeriods.add(maxInterval);" be deleted ? - Puneet Gupta On Aug. 28, 2017, 11:38 a.m., Rajitha R wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/61938/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 28, 2017, 11:38 a.m.) > > > Review request for lens, Amareshwari Sriramadasu and Rajat Khandelwal. > > > Repository: lens > > > Description > ------- > > Fix for time_range_in clause not resolving in rewrite > > > Diffs > ----- > > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java > 2b1add3 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61938/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Rajitha R > >
