On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > Rolf Kulemann wrote: > > > That people think that the UNSTABLE (1.4) trunk should be used in > > production, is a bit crazy. Projects, which decide to use our as > > unstable decalared trunk in production should switch there project > > managers or at least there development strategy. > > > > Only official releases should used in production. > > i disagree, because that presents a chicken & egg situation. without the > university of zurich going live with 1.2 early for example, it would not > have settled into stability the same way. only production brings out the > obscure issues.. >
This is true and we use 1.2.X just now (and not 1.2.2) but this a somehow unsatisfying situation because we would favor to be based on a official release (but 1.2.0 had some bugs which were fixed on 1.2.X). Probably the use of a svn version in production has something to do with the age of the project. Or can your imagine to download a svn version of the apache httpd server to use it in production? Jann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
