Michael Wechner wrote:
I think it's very clear where it is leading and that it might take some
time,
but again and again it's about getting started and that's the whole point.
i have no idea what you intend to do with things like
<cmui>
<response type="edit-new">
<edit-new>
<templates>
<template name="Letter" src="http://foo.bar/letter.xml"/>
<template name="Article" src="http://foo.bar/article.xml"/>
</templates>
</edit-new>
</response>
</cmui>
but it's a *long* way from coming up with random xml like that to
something useful.
I think pure WebDAV is just a too little step and just not sufficient.
Whereas WebDAV might be useful for specific things, but that's what needs
to be figured out.
webdav is useful and proven for abstracting editing of web ressources,
which is the scope of this SOC proposal. i don't see how the markup
above adds anything at all to the problem at hand.
But you can only do this by being aware of the bigger picture.
And this why I think Zhiwu should work within the "framework" of OSR-101.
you will have to heavily extend that document first. currently, there is
no framework there.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
