On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 17:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Josias Thoeny wrote: [...] > > > Or should there be no sitetree attributes at all, only meta data? > > IMO yes, there should be only meta data.
One could argue that the sitetree is just a view of the data, and the visibility is a property of the view, not of the data itself. But I don't know... > > The problem about meta data is that they can't be resolved during > site structure traversal, e.g., in an XSLT that is applied to the > sitetree. > > We could add a transformation to the sitetree which adds the meta data > as attributes (or a particular subset of the meta data). With JCR, > the performance issue might be secondary. Our experience with the jcr sitetree (each sitetree node is represented by a jcr node with properties) showed that the performance could be a problem. The generation of navigation elements (e.g. the menu) was much slower than with the in-memory dom sitetree. But it also depends on the number of nodes. Josias > > -- Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
