El sáb, 04-02-2006 a las 22:29 +0100, Michael Wechner escribió:
...
> I think this RM discussion shows that the Lenya community doesn't really
> know what it stands for and I think we have to figure that out resp. gain
> common ground.
The fact of the RM thread is *3* -1 votes and *no* +1 (till now). The
common opinion in this project is that we do not want to connect RM to
activity ("If committers don't want to, then I think they should
retire ...").
Further the fact of this thread is *5* +1 votes and *1* -1 (till now)
which shows common ground that the committers want to see Antonio as RM.
http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
"Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes
than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed --
regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of
votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the
issue is typically not pursued...)"
salu2
--
thorsten
"Together we stand, divided we fall!"
Hey you (Pink Floyd)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
