Andreas Hartmann wrote:
at the time of 1.4 branching, we would stop maintaining the 1.2 branch.
Yes, that occured to me too as the only reasonable consequence.
But is this really feasible, given that the migration from 1.2
to 1.4 is not really trivial?
there is precedent for this: httpd.
many people are still on 1.3, even though it is unmaintained except for
security fixes. the httpd developers also strongly suggest people
upgrade in their release notes and of course do not add any new features
to 1.3
Well, in want of an alternative, I'd agree to this practice.
I'd rather give some migration support than delay the 1.4 release
much further.
What do the others think?
obviously +1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
