Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb: > Bob Harner wrote: >> On 3/15/07, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> They are part of XHTML strict. However, by default the RNG schema used >>> is only a subset of the full XHTML specification. Looks like you'll need >>> to look at ./src/modules/xhtml/resources/schemas/xhtml.rng and make sure >>> you are including xhtml/modules/table.rng. I think if you comment out >>> the basic schema in exchange for either XHTML or XHTML-strict you should >>> be okay. Will need to build again. >> >> If true, can anyone explain why the RNG schema used for these editors >> doesn't contain the full XHTML spec? > > i have wondered the same. while it does make sense in many cases to > restrict the set of allowed xhtml elements in custom doctypes, the > default one should provide full xhtml support imho. (plus the current > set of allowed elements does not make all that much sense...) > > can anyone comment on this?
I don't remember a reason for the restriction. Maybe it will become obvious when we change it, though ... > otherwise i'd consider it a bug. +1 It's certainly an FAQ, we should do something about it. -- Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
