Bob Harner wrote:
Lenya devs,
The 1.4 release has taken almost 3 years to develop, and in the
process it has become a rather major rewrite of Lenya. Does it
warrant being called 2.0? When the release is finally announced, a
2.0 designation might grab more attention, which is a good thing.
do you really want to outsmart people, because this is what it sounds to me?
I don't think the ASF is about marketing people into something, but
rather providing great code/product and
because of that people will start using it. But that means patience ...
To me a new major version number implies:
* major architectural changes
* significant upgrade effort
I am afraid that this (upgrade effort) is very true
* major new functionality
* lots of cool new things to learn about
btw, is there a list of all the new functionality and cool things to
learn yet?
Cheers
Michael
and a ".0" minor version implies:
* some risk of bugginess, until the ".1" or ".01" release comes out.
That describes the current Lenya code pretty well.
I think the only real cost of the change would be updating the
documentation, wiki and bugzilla, which I would be happy to do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Michael Wechner
Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Yanel, Yulup
http://www.wyona.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+41 44 272 91 61
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
