Bob Harner schrieb: > Lenya devs, > > The 1.4 release has taken almost 3 years to develop, and in the > process it has become a rather major rewrite of Lenya. Does it > warrant being called 2.0? When the release is finally announced, a > 2.0 designation might grab more attention, which is a good thing.
I think this is a good idea - not primarily because of the increased attention, but because of the points you mentioned below. > To me a new major version number implies: > > * major architectural changes > * significant upgrade effort > * major new functionality > * lots of cool new things to learn about +1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning "[...] the major number is increased when there are significant jumps in functionality [...]" IMO this is the case in our situation. -- Andreas > > and a ".0" minor version implies: > > * some risk of bugginess, until the ".1" or ".01" release comes out. > > That describes the current Lenya code pretty well. > > I think the only real cost of the change would be updating the > documentation, wiki and bugzilla, which I would be happy to do. -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
