Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> there's a (trivial) patch in my queue that cleans up the syntax of >> resource type declarations a bit. i'd like to sneak it in before 2.0, >> but it will mean people have to change their custom resource types a >> little. any objections? > > Would you mind attaching the patch so that we can take a look? TIA!
i'd rather not do that, but do a series of incremental commits instead... here are the changes i'm thinking of, maybe you can comment on them:
<schema src="foo" language=""/>
<schema uri="foo" language="rng"/>
<link-rewrite xpath="/foo/bar"/>
unchanged (or maybe removed, depending on how it interacts with proxying and link rewriting)
<sample-name name="foo" mime-type="application/bar">foo://bar</sample-name> or <samples uri="foo://bar.xml"/>
<sample name="foo" mime-type="application/bar" uri="foo://bar"/> <samples uri="foo://bar/baz.xml"/>
<format name="foo" uri="foo://bar"/>
unchanged
<expires secords="42"/>
<cache seconds="42"/> wdyt? -- jörn nettingsmeier home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/ http://spunk.dnsalias.org phone://+49/201/491621 Kurt is up in Heaven now. -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
