Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>> there's a (trivial) patch in my queue that cleans up the syntax of >>> resource type declarations a bit. i'd like to sneak it in before 2.0, >>> but it will mean people have to change their custom resource types a >>> little. any objections? >> >> Would you mind attaching the patch so that we can take a look? TIA! > > i'd rather not do that, but do a series of incremental commits instead... > here are the changes i'm thinking of, maybe you can comment on them: > >>> <schema src="foo" language=""/> > > <schema uri="foo" language="rng"/>
+1 > >>> <link-rewrite xpath="/foo/bar"/> > > unchanged (or maybe removed, depending on how it interacts with proxying > and link rewriting) > >>> <sample-name name="foo" >>> mime-type="application/bar">foo://bar</sample-name> >>> or >>> <samples uri="foo://bar.xml"/> > > <sample name="foo" mime-type="application/bar" uri="foo://bar"/> > <samples uri="foo://bar/baz.xml"/> +1 >>> <format name="foo" uri="foo://bar"/> > > unchanged > >>> <expires secords="42"/> > > <cache seconds="42"/> The problem here is that the method is "ResourceType.getExpires()". If we change the configuration, we should also change the API. "expires" is maybe more precise. What do the others think? -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
