DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43136>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43136 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-21 07:52 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > If we don't lock the sitetree, we have to implement the usecases > very carefully: > > * reload the sitetree before committing > * check out the sitetree > * re-check the preconditions (parent exists, no node with same name) > * apply the changes > * commit the transaction > * check in the sitetree I just tried that, but it is quite a complex change. IMO the single-node locking approach would be much cleaner and much more generic, though I don't know how complex the implementation will be. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
