Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Hi Lenya devs, > > IMO the description "default publication" isn't appropriate anymore, > because it's really just a demo of some of the modules with a particular > layout. In 1.2 it was different because we had no modules and a lot of > the functionality was located in the publication. > > I could imagine that demo visitors would find it less misleading if it > was called "example publication". WDYT?
+1 i've always felt that "default" was kinda wrong, because people should generally not use it as a template imho, because it contains too many assumptions. "example" sounds good. privately, i'm using a stripped down "basic" publication which i use as a template - i'm going to commit it to the sandbox after some polishing, maybe others find it useful. -- Jörn Nettingsmeier "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
